Most math concepts are intuitive, simple, yet subtle. A similar opinion is expressed by Prof. Michael Spivak in his magnum opus, Differential Geometry (preface). It also reminds me — a famous quote of the ever-quotable Albert Einstein: “everything should be as simple as possible, and not simpler.”
I have an illustrative example of this opinion(s) here:
Consider the principle of mathematical induction:
Most students use the first version of it quite mechanically. But, is it really so? You can think about the following simple intuitive argument which when formalized becomes the principle of mathematical induction:
Theorem: First Principle of Finite Induction:
Let S be a set of positive integers with the following properties:
- The integer 1 belongs to S.
- Whenever the integer k is in S, the next integer must also be in S.
Then, S is the set of all positive integers.
The proof of condition 1 is called basis step for the induction. The proof of 2 is called the induction step. The assumptions made in carrying out the induction step are known as induction hypotheses. The induction situation has been likened to an infinite row of dominoes all standing on edge and arranged in such a way that when one falls it knocks down the next in line. If either no domino is pushed over (that is, there is no basis for the induction), or if the spacing is too large (that is, the induction step fails), then the complete line will not fall.
So, also remember that the validity of the induction step does not necessarily depend on the truth of the statement that one is endeavouring to prove.